The
following article is a direct translation from the classic
genealogical and heraldic reference 'Herbarz Polski" by Kasper
Niesiecki S.J. Lipsk edition 1839-46 Translated by William F
Hoffman.
There are two white arrows, broken, on a blue
field, arranged so that one of the arrowheads points up and the
other down; on the helm is a peacock with its tail spread; its beak
points to the shield's right, and in the beak it holds an arrow,
likewise broken and twisted upward.
Bielski. fol. 228. Paprocki w Gniazdzie fol. 305.
o herbach fol. 182. Okolski tom. 1. Ks. Petrasancta has
no such arms, but he does say of France that this coat of arms is
common there: a gold eagle on a shield on which there are, as in our
Bogorya arms, two broken arrows with silver arrow-heads. Petrasancta
cap. 63. fol 528.
All of our writers agree that these arms were born
here in Poland on a particular occasion. Boleslaw the Brave, armed
with only 3,000 of his cavalry, attacked a much larger band of
Polovtsy near Snowskie and struck down the leader of the foe: in
this fray one colonel from among the others, named Bogorya, mowed
down Polovtsy with great courage of heart, and, heartening his
forces to victory in his battalion, bore several wounds and arrows
in his body. Boleslaw, returning from the site, saw Bogorya, and
extracted those arrows from his chest with his own royal hands; and
Boleslaw conferred them, broken as they were, on him and his
descendants as an eternal honor. This first owner of the arms was
supposedly Michal Bogorya, whose name I read in a decree granting
privileges to Holy Cross monastery near Sendomierz in 1069, and a
little before that in the papers of Trzemeszno monastery, when he
was given the title of count, from which Paprocki concludes that
this house must have had its earliest origins from that point.
In praising the Bogorya family Dlugosz says that
they were always Humani, et tractabiles (humane and
reasonable), and that was evident in the first ancestors of this
house and the way they endeared themselves to their lords' hearts.
Mikolaj Bogorya, voivode of Sendornierz under and highly esteemed by
the Polish king Kazimierz the Just, was held in no less regard by
the king's sons: sharing with God his substance, he bequeathed the
Miechow convent the villages Jaxyce and Rzeplice; it is unknown by
what law the villages later ceased to be part of this foundation. Nakielski,
Miechow. fol. 69 et 101.
Regarding this Mikolaj there is more in Miechowita
swiadczy lib. 3. cap. 6. Paprocki o herb. fol. 182. Starowolski in
Vitis Episc. Cracov.
I add this from the accounts of years: that he
added to Koprzywnica monastery several of his villages as an eternal
bequest, and by this his example he encouraged others of his house
to similar generosity; and that in 1185 they made God and the
Koprzywnica church heirs of their fortune. Mikolaj was Zawichowski (Zawichost?)
castellan in 1311. On this see Kromer lib. 14.
Jaroslaw Bogorya was 28th archbishop of Gniezno.
In his youth his parents sent him to study in Bologna, and in
several years he advanced in knowledge so much that the whole
academy chose him to be rector. He administered the academy with
great credit, and with no less generosity of heart; for when the
Bologna magistrate sentenced to the sword a certain English student
convicted of some illegal excess, Bogorya defended the integrity of
the academy's right by moving it to another place, returning it to
Bologna only after he had received satisfaction on the score of the
student's killing, on which see Damalewicz in Vitis Archiep. Gnesn.
But Paprocki o herb. fol. 182
has more to say on this subject.
Jaroslow ordered the English student executed for adultery he'd
committed with the husband's consent; but he regretted it so much
that he established a chapel for the dead man's soul at the behest
of Pope John XXII. No more can one prove Damalewicz's surmise in
that same work that his Bogorya, on a pilgrimage from Bologna to
Avignon, was named archbishop of Gniezno there by Pope Clement Vl:
for Dlugosz
clearly says that in 1343 the Gniezno chapter, at the
instance of King Kazimierz, chose him for that office unanimously on
14 February 1342 - at the time he was only Archdeacon of Krakow and
Gniezno canon.This much is certain, that Jaroslow carried out his
pastoral functions with extraordinary prudence, for he visited not
only his own diocese but also those of other bishops of his
metropolis. With King Kazimierz he settled successfully in 1361 the
controversies that had been growing greater and greater for several
years between Bodzenta, bishop of Krakow, and the landowners of
Krakow and Sendomierz provinces concerning tithes, ecclesiastical
jurisdiction, exemption of clerics from lay courts, and the funding
of new rectories. Lublin and Sieciechow, districts has
been desolated by the pagans' continual raids, and so he exempted
them from paying tithes for thirty years. Damalewicz, Kromer. Through
King Kazimierz he frustrated the designs of the Roman Emperor
Charles IV to separate the Wroclaw bishops from the Gniezno
metropolis, but later united his granddaughter in matrimony with
this Charles in Krakow, and Kazimierz showed his gratitude for this
by leaving several bequests to his cathedral in his will. But after
Kazimierz's death, when the coronation approached of the successor
to the Polish throne, Louis, the King of Hungary, Jaroslow, by
agreement with the viovodes of Great Poland, wanted to crown him
nowhere else than in Gniezno: but he finally acceded to the royal
will and celebrated the ceremony in Krakow, inasmuch as Louis wished
to follow the example of Wladyslaw Lokietek and Kazimierz, who had
been inaugurated there. He cut off the Mazovian prince Ziemowit from
the community of the faithful with ecclesiastical punishments
because the latter had looked the other way - and may even have
ordered it - as Piotrasz with his people plundered church
properties: Ziemowit repaid the harm he'd done by leaving two
villages to Gniezno cathedral in perpetuity. For damage done the
church Jaroslaw took from Tomislaw z Przespolewa the village
Kowalewo and attached it to the church. In addition he endowed Znin
and the hamlet of Kamien, and he managed the kowicz demesne, which
at that time he had been so devastated that it produced barely a
grzywna of income for the treasury, so that by that time it brought
in 800 grzywna annually. In addition, having preceded King Kazimierz
the hamlet of Przedecz and Zarow with its lake, he took for them
Spicimierz castle and village, Wolszczyce, and Kotamino; and again
for Chroszlin he took Krolewce and Tarnkow, he took from the king Cienia and Michalow in Kalisz province.
Thus administering his church's income, he worked for the greater
glory of God: for this purpose he tore down ancient, mouldering
wooden houses of God and erected ones of his own funding in Gniezno,
Kurzelow, Opatow, and Skotniki, his ancestral estates. In Uniejow he
invested and endowed canons at the church of the Virgin Mary; he
also endowed the parsonage at the church of St. Mikolaj, and in 1370
ceded it to the Benedictine Fathers, adding the village Biedrzykow.
Having restored the ruined collegiate-church in Kalisz, he added to
it the villages of Tyniec and Dobczyce. He provided for tithes for
other churches, e. g., in Budyowsice, in Pabianice, St. Stanislaw in
Krakow, at the St. George castle, and did the same for the Krzepice
church and thus for the town of Krzepice, which no longer belonged
to his archdiocese, but Bodzenta, the Krakow bishop, looked the
other way. Here I will not mention how many parishes he provided
with ecclesiastical equipment. In Gniezno, Kalisz, Wielun, and
Leczyca he established episcopal courts. He introduced regular
canons for the Kalisz parish of St. Mikolaj in 1358 at King
Kazimierz's request. He consecrated four Plock bishops - Janislaw
Wronski, and the Gulczewskis, Mikolaj, Stanishlaw and Dobieslaw - as
well as Poznan bishop Jan, and Krystyn, the first archbishop of
Halicz, although Miechowita incorrectly credits Jakob Swinka with
this. Proceeding to the last years of pastoral labors of his 100
years, when he began to weaken visibly, he intended to resign his
archepiscopate to his subordinate, Mikolaj z Koszutowa, Gniezno
pastor, and he would have done so; but when Mikolaj, without consent
of the chapter and even of the king, sought the appointment in
Avignon from Pope Gregory, Jan Paszkowicz, the Gniezno chanter (kantor),
was sent to the Pope by the chapter expressly to frustrate his
designs, and did so. But shortly thereafter Bogorya resigned his
cathedral to Jan z Strzeice, named Suchywilk, his nephew, with the
permission of all concerned, and kept only two demesnes for himself.
Wanting then to live more peacefully in God, he lived for two years
in Lad monastery, then moved to Kalisz, where he died in 1376, after
34 years as an archbishop. He ordered that after his death he should
be buried in Gniezno in a chapel he had erected: but he should be
brought not through the doors but through a hole made in the wall;
he wanted his body carried to his grave that way because, as he said
about himself, he did not enter the office of archbishop by the
route prescribed by church canons; which voluntary confession about
himself Spondanus particularly praises. A headstone was
erected
for him in 1562 by Jan Kokalewski, Gniezno chancellor, with the memorial commendation of
his virtues: you will find it in Paprocki. I came to see it in MS.
Coll. Caliss. S.J. extrakt ex libro Benefic. with the seal of
the Gniezno chapter, in which I read that this Jaroslow endowed the
Kazimierz church in the archdiocese with new income in 1375, at the
behest of Piotr, Lubusz bishop. The following wrote about him: Spondan.
Ann. Eccles. anno 1376 num. 8. Bzovius anno 1374 num. 15.
Dlugosz 1372. Paprocki o herb.
fol. 182. Damale. in Archiep.
Gnes. Nakiel. fol. 302. Szczygiel. in Tinec.
fol. 118. Cichoc. Alloc. Osec. lib. 8
cap. 13.
ARMS
| Buczkowski |
Porebny |
| Gniazdowski |
Skotnicki |
| Gorski |
Staszkowski |
|
Kolanowski |
Tarnowski |
| Maciejowicz |
Tur |
| Magnuski |
Wolowicz |
| Mokranowski |
Zakrzewski |
| Podleski |
|
But not all use the Bogorya arms in the form
described earlier. In the first place, the house of Porebny places a
cross formed as a written letter X between the two broken arrows.
The Gorski and Tur families bear both arrows joined as if one; on
the helm there are three ostrich feathers, two on the sides red, the
third white. Others in Lithuania add a cross across the middle of
the two arrows joined as one, as I saw in Krzysztof Bialozor's
panegyric Upomniki. |